Skorin_Manual de oftalmología_1ed
SECCIÓN 2 Principios de los procedimientos en la consulta
44
TABLA 4-5 SUTURAS REABSORBIBLES SUTURA VENTAJAS
DESVENTAJAS
USOS
• Ácido poligli cólico
• Menor respuesta inflamatoria que con el catgut • Excelente seguridad del nudo • Menor respuesta inflamatoria que con el catgut • Excelente seguridad del nudo • Más flexible y conserva la resis tencia a la tracción durante más tiempo que el ácido poliglicólico • Menor respuesta inflamatoria que el catgut • Conserva la resistencia a la trac ción durante más tiempo que la poliglactina 910
• Longevidad intermedia dentro de la herida
• Suturas enterradas en todas las zonas
• Poliglac tina 910
• Suturas enterradas en todas las zonas
• Polidioxa nona
• Tiene menos flexibili dad y más memoria • Los nudos pueden ser menos seguros
• Excelente para heridas so metidas a gran tensión o en zonas donde se producen movimientos
REFERENCIAS
1. Shen KT, Chang HC, Chen WL, et al. Design of microsurgical instruments for ophthalmology. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H: J Engineer Med . 2005;219(4): 223-229. 2. Kosins TR. Designing an efficient and safe office-based surgery suite. Clin Plast Surg . 2012;39(3):405-411. 3. Kheirabadi GT, Crissey JL. Topical hemostatic agents for the management of bleeding in patients undergoing surgery. J Blood Med . 2015;6:245-256. 4. Tsung JW. Judkins SS. Roles and responsibilities of the surgical assistant in office-based surgery. Clin Plast Surg . 2013;40(4):521-530. 5. Rainchuso DL. Hazardous materials management in the dental office. Dent Clin N Am. 2019;63(4):553-567. 6. Mehta DK, Selvaraj BR. Handling and disposal of hazardous materials in the physician office. Am Fam Physician . 2019;99(12):759-766. 7. Petrilli JM. Sharps safety in the physician office setting. J Am Board Fam Med . 2015;28(5):655-661. 8. Bono AL, Cash JC. Infection control in office-based surgery . J Am Acad Orthop Surg . 2014;22(12):771-777. 9. DeLong KR, Siegel EL. Infection control in office-based dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Clin . 2018;36(3):239-247. 10. Clayton JL, Hoehn RA. Establishing a sterile field for office-based surgery. Am Fam Physician . 2014;89(5):342-348. 11. Glaser ME, Hsu KG. Establishing and maintaining a sterile field in the outpatient setting. Aesthet Surg J . 2017;37(2):237-243. 12. Linberg JA, Friedman AS. Sterile technique for office-based procedures. Am Fam Physician . 2015;92(6):516-522. 13. Tackett EJ, Kremer T, Rich JD, Alfandre D. Risk of blood-borne infection transmission in office-based surgical facilities. J Gen Intern Med . 2017;32(9):1016-1021. 14. Gershon KM, Karkashian CD, Vlahov D, et al. Transmission of blood-borne pathogens in US outpatient settings: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis . 2009;9(1):1-23. 15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities. 2008. https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/disinfection/index.html 16. Dozier JW, Culbertson JM. Surgical instrumentation for office-based ophthalmic surgery. Surv Ophthalmol . 2005;50(3):265-272. 17. Widder RP, Dietlein KA. Surgical instruments for office-based ophthalmic surgery. Ophthalmologe . 2016;113(10):828-834. 18. Hwang SM, Goldberg RA. Suture selection in oculoplastic surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol . 2014;25(5):441-447. 19. Yoon D, Kim JH. Surgical sutures in ophthalmic plastic surgery: a review. Arch Plast Surg . 2020;47(5):419-425. 20. Park SB, Lee JY, Kim SG. Surgical sutures in ophthalmic plastic surgery: a practical review. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc . 2017;58(11):1162-1168. 21. Yen JT. Suture materials and techniques in oculofacial plastic surgery. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol . 2016;5(4):274-281.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of the content is prohibited.
Made with FlippingBook. PDF to flipbook with ease