Epstein.Interpretación de biopsias de la próstata, 6ed

209

INFORME DEL CÁNCER 

38. Poulos CK, Daggy JK, Cheng L. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens. Cancer . 2004;101(3):527–532. 39. Terris MK, Haney DJ, Johnstone IM, et al. Prediction of prostate cancer volume using prostate-specific antigen levels, transrectal ultrasound, and systematic sextant biopsies. Urology . 1995;45(1):75–80. 40. Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M, et al. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA . 1994;271(5):368–374. 41. Anast JW, Andriole GL, Bismar TA, et al. Relating biopsy and clinical variables to radical prostatec- tomy findings: can insignificant and advanced prostate cancer be predicted in a screening population? Urology . 2004;64(3):544–550. 42. Allan RW, Sanderson H, Epstein JI. Correlation of minute (0.5 MM or less) focus of prostate ade- nocarcinoma on needle biopsy with radical prostatectomy specimen: role of prostate specific antigen density. J Urol . 2003;170(2, pt 1):370–372. 43. Ochiai A, Troncoso P, Chen ME, et al. The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing multisite extended biopsy: implication for expectant management. J Urol . 2005;174(6):2164–2168, discussion 2168. 44. Guzzo TJ, Vira M, Hwang WT, et al. Impact of multiple biopsy cores on predicting final tumor vo- lume in prostate cancer detected by a single microscopic focus of cancer on biopsy. Urology . 2005;66(2):361–365. 45. Zackrisson B, Aus G, Bergdahl S, et al.The risk of finding focal cancer (less than 3 mm) remains high on re-biopsy of patients with persistently increased prostate specific antigen but the clinical signifi- cance is questionable. J Urol . 2004;171(4):1500–1503. 46. Bruce RG, Rankin WR, Cibull ML, et al. Single focus of adenocarcinoma in the prostate biopsy speci- men is not predictive of the pathologic stage of disease. Urology . 1996;48(1):75–79. 47. Dietrick DD, McNeal JE, Stamey TA. Core cancer length in ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies: a preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer volume. Urology . 1995;45(6):987–992. 48. Wang X, Brannigan RE, Rademaker AW, et al. One core positive prostate biopsy is a poor predictor of cancer volume in the radical prostatectomy specimen. J Urol . 1997;158(4):1431–1435. 49. Weldon VE, Tavel FR, Neuwirth H, et al. Failure of focal prostate cancer on biopsy to predict focal prostate cancer: the importance of prevalence. J Urol . 1995;154(3):1074–1077. 50. Fromont G, Baumert H, Cathelineau X, et al. Intraoperative frozen section analysis during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study. J Urol . 2003;170(5):1843–1846. 51. Goharderakhshan RZ, Sudilovsky D, Carroll LA, et al. Utility of intraoperative frozen section analy- sis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy. Urology . 2002;59(5):709–714. 52. Vaidya A, Hawke C, Tiguert R, et al. Intraoperative T staging in radical retropubic prostatectomy: is it reliable? Urology . 2001;57(5):949–954. 53. Hernandez DJ, Epstein JI,Trock BJ, et al. Radical retropubic prostatectomy. How often do experien- ced surgeons have positive surgical margins when there is extraprostatic extension in the region of the neurovascular bundle? J Urol . 2005;173(2):446–449. 54. Graefen M, Haese A, Pichlmeier U, et al. A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: a tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol . 2001;165(3): 857–863. 55. Steuber T, Graefen M, Haese A, et al. Validation of a nomogram for prediction of side specific extra- capsular extension at radical prostatectomy. J Urol . 2006;175(3, pt 1):939–944. 56. Ohori M, Kattan MW, Koh H, et al. Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: a nomogram for staging prostate cancer. J Urol . 2004;171(5):1844–1849. 57. Shah O, Robbins DA, Melamed J, et al.The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol . 2003;169(6): 2147–2152. 58. Tsuzuki T, Hernandez DJ, Aydin H, et al. Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. J Urol . 2005;173(2):450–453. SAMPLE