Cahill_Monitarización de la frecuencia cardiaca fetal_5ed

210

Monitorización de la frecuencia cardíaca fetal

and existential considerations after involvement in traumatic childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand . 2016;95(7):735-745. 25. Mitchell JT, Everly GS. Critical Incident Stress Debriefing: An Operations Manual for CISD, Defusing and Other Group Crisis Intervention Services . 3rd ed. Chevron Publishing; 2001. 26. Scott SD, Hirschinger LE, Cox KR, McCoig M, Brandt J, Hall L. The natural history of recovery for the health care provider “second victim” after adverse patient events. Qual Saf Health Care . 2009;18(5):325-330. 27. Wu AW, Steckelberg RC. Medical error, incident investigation and the second victim: doing better but feeling worse? BMJ Qual Saf . 2012;21(4):267-270. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000605. 28. Seys D, Wu AW, Van Gerven E, et al. Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof . 2013;36(2):135-162. 29. Schwappach DL, Boluarte TA. The emotional impact of medical error involvement on physicians: a call for leadership and organ isational accountability. Swiss Med Wkly . 2009;139(1-2):9-15. 30. Miller L. Intrapartum fetal monitoring: liability and documenta tion. Clin Obstet Gynecol . 2011;54(1):50-55. 31. Pettker CM. Systematic approaches to adverse events in obstet rics, Part I: event identification and classification. Semin Perina tol . 2017;41(3):151-155. 32. PressGaney. The HPI SEC & SSER patient safety measurement guide. 2021. https://info.pressganey.com/e-books-research/the hpi-sec-sser-patient-safety-measurement-system-for-healthcare. Accessed November 18, 2023. 33. Sentinel Event Policy and Procedures. https://www.jointcom mission.org/resources/sentinel-event/sentinel-event-policy- and-procedures/. Accessed August 8, 2024. 34. National Quality Form. List of SREs. https://www.qualityforum. org/Topics/SREs/List_of_SREs.aspx. Accessed November 11, 2023. 35. Pettker CM. Systematic approaches to adverse events in obstet rics, Part II: event analysis and response. Semin Perinatol . 2017; 41(3):156-160. 36. RCA2. Improving Root Cause Analyses and Actions to Prevent Harm . National Patient Safety Foundation; 2015. 37. The Joint Commission. Framework for Root Cause Analysis and Corrective Actions. 2017. https://www.jcrinc.com/assets/1/7/ Appendix_Framework_for_RCA_and_Corrective_Actions. docx. Accessed November 11, 2023. 38. Fein SP, Hilborne LH, Spiritus EM, et al. The many faces of error disclosure: a common set of elements and a definition. J Gen Intern Med . 2007;22(6):755-761. 39. Helmchen LA, Richards MR, McDonald TB. How does routine disclosure of medical error affect patients’ propensity to sue and their assessment of provider quality? Evidence from survey data. Med Care . 2010;48(11):955-961. 40. Kachalia A, Kaufman SR, Boothman R, et al. Liability claims and costs before and after implementation of a medical error disclo sure program. Ann Intern Med . 2010;153(4):213-221. 41. Alfirevic Z, Gyte GML, Cuthbert A, Devane D. Continuous car diotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2017;2:CD006066.

8. Pratt SD, Mann S, Salisbury M, et al. John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards: impact of CRM-based training on obstetric outcomes and clinicians’ patient safety attitudes. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf . 2007;33(12):720-725. 9. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM. Managing the Unexpected: Sustained Performance in a Complex World . 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2015. 10. Patient Safety Network (PDNet). High reliability. 2019. https:// psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/high-reliability. Accessed October 14, 2023. 11. Chassin MR, Loeb JM. High-reliability health care: getting there from here. Milbank Q . 2013; 91(3):459-490. doi: 10.1111/ 1468-0009.12023. 12. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Team STEPPS. https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps-program/index.html. Accessed October 14, 2023. 13. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Hospi tal survey on patient safety culture. 2004. https://www.ahrq.gov/ sops/surveys/hospital/index.html. Accessed October 14, 2023. 14. Setola N, Naldi E, Cocina GG, Eide LB, Iannuzzi L, Daly D. The impact of the physical environment on intrapartum maternity care: identification of eight crucial building spaces. HERD . 2019; 12(4):67-98. 15. Ariadne Lab & MASS Design Group. Designing capacity for high value healthcare: the impact of design on clinical care in childbirth. 2017. https://www.ariadnelabs.org/. Accessed October 14, 2023. 16. Berridge EJ, Mackintosh NJ, Freeth DS. Supporting patient safety: examining communication within delivery suite teams through contrasting approaches to research observation. Midwifery . 2010;26(5):512-519. 17. Hammond A. A space of possibilities: the importance of birth unit design. Aust Midwifery News . 2015;15(3):28-31. 18. Hammond A, Foureur M, Homer CSE. The hardware and soft ware implications of hospital birth room design: a midwifery perspective. Midwifery . 2014;30(7):825-830. 19. Pettker CM. Standardization of intrapartum management and impact on adverse outcomes. Clin Obstet Gynecol . 2011;54(1):8-15. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31820a033d. 20. Clark SL, Belfort MA, Byrum SL, Meyers JA, Perlin JB. Improved outcomes, fewer cesarean deliveries, and reduced litigation: results of a new paradigm in patient safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2008;199:105.e1-e7. 21. The Joint Commission. Sentinel event data summary. https://www. jointcommission.org/resources/sentinel-event/sentinel-event- data-summary/. Accessed November 2, 2023. 22. Edrees H, Connors C, Paine L, Norvell M, Taylor H, Wu AW. Implementing the RISE second victim support programme at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: a case study. BMJ Open . 2016; 6(9):e011708. 23. Schrøder K, Edrees HH, Christensen RD, Jørgensen JS, Lam ont RF, Hvidt NC. Second victims in the labor ward: are Danish midwives and obstetricians getting the support they need? Int J Qual Health Care . 2019;31(8):583-589. 24. Schrøder K, Jørgensen JS, Lamont RF, Hvidt NC. Blame and guilt: a mixed methods study of obstetricians’ and midwives’ experiences

Copyright © 2026 Wolters Kluwer, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of the content is prohibited.