Rockwood, Green, and Wilkins' Fractures, 10e Package

130

SECTION ONE • General Principles

58. Siebenrock KA, Gerber C. The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am . 1993;75(12):1751–1755. 59. Stannard JP, Lopez R, Volgas D. Soft tissue injury of the knee after tibial plateau frac tures. J Knee Surg . 2010;23(4):187–192. 60. Swiontkowski MF, Sands AK, Agel J, et al. Interobserver variation in the AO/OTA fracture classification system for pilon fractures: is there a problem? J Orthop Trauma . 1997;11(7):467–470. 61. Tanzi L, Audisio A, Cirrincione G, et al. Vision Transformer for femur fracture clas sification. Injury . 2022;53(7):2625–2634. 62. Tile M, Pennal GF. Pelvic disruption: principles of management. Clin Orthop Relat Res . 1980;151:56–64. 63. Valderrama-Molina CO, Estrada-Castrillon M, Hincapie JA, Lugo-Agudelo LH. Intra- and interobserver agreement on the Oestern and Tscherne classification of soft tissue injury in periarticular lower-limb closed fractures. Colomb Med (Cali) . 2014;45(4):173–178. 64. Voss EE, Goode RD, Cook JL, Crist BD. Survey of orthopaedic trauma providers: is MRI superior to CT scan for evaluating and preoperative planning for tibial plateau fractures? Mo Med . 2022;119(3):261–265. 65. Yacoubian SV, Nevins RT, Sallis JG, et al. Impact of MRI on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma . 2002; 16(9):632–637. 66. Yan B, Sun J, Yin W. The prevalence of soft tissue injuries in operative Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg . 2021;141(8):1269– 1275. 67. Young JW, Burgess AR, Brumback RJ, Poka A. Pelvic fractures: value of plain radiog raphy in early assessment and management. Radiology . 1986;160:445–451. 68. Zhang Y, Wang R, Hu J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed topography (CT) analysis of Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fracture revealed pos sible mechanisms of injury beyond varus deforming force. Injury . 2022;53(2): 683–690.

45. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Open Fracture Study Group. A new classification scheme for open fractures. J Orthop Trauma . 2010;24(8):457–464. 46. Otero JE, Westerlind BO, Tantavisut S, et al. There is poor reliability of Bohler’s angle and the crucial angle of Gissane in assessing displaced intra-articular calcaneal frac tures. Foot and Ankle Surgery . 2015;21(4):277–281. 47. Pflüger P, Harder F, Müller K, et al. Evaluation of ankle fracture classification systems in 193 trimalleolar ankle fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg . 2022;48(5):4181–4188. 48. Rao K, Dibbern K, Day M, et al. Correlation of fracture energy with Sanders clas sification and post-traumatic osteoarthritis after displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures. J Orthop Trauma . 2019;33(5):261–266. 49. Samuel AL. Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J Res Dev . 1959;3:210–220. 50. Sanders R. Displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2000;82(2):225–250. 51. Sanders R, Fortin P, DiPasquale T, Walling A. Operative treatment in 120 displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: results using a prognostic computed tomography scan classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res . 1993;290:87–95. 52. Sanders R, Vaupel Z, Erdogan M, Downes K. Operative treatment of displaced intra-ar ticular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs): long term (10-20 years) results in 108 fractures using a prognostic CT classification. J Orthop Trauma . 2014;28(10):551–563. 53. Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bruce D. The tibial plateau fracture: the Toronto experience 1968–1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res . 1979;(138):94–104. 54. Schultz RJ. The Language of Fractures . Williams & Wilkins; 1990. 55. Segal D, Marsh JL, Leiter B. Clinical application of computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanning of calcaneus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res . 1985;(199):114–123. 56. Shen M, Wang C, Chen H, et al. An update on the Pauwels classification. J Orthop Surg Res . 2016;11(1):161. 57. Sidor ML, Zuckerman JD, Lyon T, et al. The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures: an assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver repro ducibility. J Bone Joint Surg Am . 1993;75(12):1745–1750.